In the case study, the challenge of accurately predicting, planning, and implementing replacements resulted in frustration, inefficiency, and unexpected costs. Shutdowns were dictated by the duration of replacements and there were risks associated with breakdown readiness and responsiveness. The solution involved changing belt and stock management, standardising and upgrading equipment for enhanced effectiveness, upgrading infrastructure to accommodate the new methodology, and appropriately resourcing the contract. The key outcomes included a significant reduction (up to 43%) in replacement windows, immediate response to breakdown scenarios, and increased production time.
The Challenge
- Struggling to accurately predict, plan, and implement replacements, causing frustration, inefficiency and unexpected cost
- Shutdowns dictated by replacement duration
- Risks associated with breakdown readiness and responsiveness
The Solution
- Belt and stock management changed
- Equipment standardised, upgraded and engineered to ensure effectiveness
- Infrastructure upgraded and engineered to accommodate new methodology
- Contract resourced to suit approach
Key Outcomes
Reduction in replacements needed
Up to 43% reduction in replacement windows
Quicker response time
Immediate response to all breakdown scenarios
More production time
Increased production time
